Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Yes? But you also left off the rest of her bio: ", professor of bioengineering at Stanford University, and a member of the National Academies’ Committee on Science and Innovation Leadership for the 21st Century."

She is an accomplished academic scientist who is now putting her effort into a technology where her science portends value. And she's explaining that technology here.

The idea is actually a very strong idea with hints towards an even more interesting future. Bionengineering these pathways into an organism (even yourself) gets you a lot of significant benefits:

- dropping the reliance on petrochemical precursors for manufacturing

- a large number of biosimilar compounds for the cost of a few rounds of evolution

- manufacturing is constant across many different drugs and involves 3 ingredients: water, light & sugar

- manufacturing is much easier and can be transported "in house" eventually into smaller and smaller scales (think yogurt or a shot of espresso)

- etc.



I didn't say anything about the strength of the idea. Her Stanford credentials are irrelevant. It's still an ad.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: